A link in bio is not a storefront

A link-in-bio page is a directory: its job is to send a visitor somewhere else. A storefront's job is to complete the purchase where the visitor already is. Every handoff between the two loses buyers, and in India the loss is worse because the destination checkout often cannot take UPI.

Updated 21 September 2026

Link-in-bio tools were invented to solve a formatting problem: one link, several destinations. They are very good at it. Selling was added later, on top of an architecture whose entire purpose is to make people leave.

What actually goes wrong

Every additional step between the tap and the payment loses people, and a link page adds at least one by definition. A visitor taps your bio link, sees a menu, picks an item, and is sent to a product page — often on a third domain, belonging to a company they have never heard of, asking for money.

In India there is usually a fourth problem waiting at the end of that chain: a checkout built for card markets, offering a payment method most of your audience does not prefer. That is not a small conversion difference on a ₹499 product.

The difference in one line

A link pageA storefront
What it is forSending visitors elsewhereCompleting a purchase
Success looks likeA click outA payment in
What it knows about a visitorWhich link they tappedWhat they bought, and their email
What happens after money changes handsNothing — it was not involvedDelivery, receipt, access, renewal
What you own afterwardsClick analyticsA customer list

The last row is the one that compounds. A link page can tell you three hundred people tapped the course link. It cannot tell you who bought, so it cannot help you sell them anything again.

When you are not selling. A creator pointing at a YouTube channel, a podcast, a newsletter and a press piece has a directory problem, and a directory is the correct tool. Putting a storefront there with nothing in it is worse than a tidy list.

It is also right alongside a store rather than instead of one — a link page as the front door for social profiles, with one of its links pointing at the place where things are actually bought. Nothing about the two conflicts.

  • Take the payment on the page, in the buyer's preferred method, in their currency.
  • Deliver immediately — the file, the group invite, the course access — without you being awake.
  • Keep the buyer's email, because the list is the asset and the page is not.
  • Handle the second purchase, which is where creator businesses actually make money.
  • Bill again next month, if anything you sell recurs.

None of those are features a link page is missing by oversight. They are a different product, and the ones that bolted commerce on are doing a harder job with the wrong shape.

Worth asking before you move 🤔

Can I sell properly from a link-in-bio page?

You can take money through the commerce features most of them added. What you usually cannot do is complete the purchase without a handoff, offer UPI to Indian buyers, or own the customer list afterwards — and those are the parts that decide revenue.

Should I use a link page and a store together?

It works well. Keep the link page as the front door for profiles, press and free content, and point one of its links at the storefront. The only thing to avoid is making buyers pass through two menus to reach one product.

Does a storefront replace Linktree?

Usually, because a storefront page can hold ordinary links alongside products. If you have thirty links and nothing for sale, Linktree is still the better tool and it costs nothing.

Stop renting your income to a platform.

Apply for early access

799 a month, 0% of your sales. No card to apply.